Archive retrospective, written in November 2026: why BGH VI ZR 247/15 remains relevant to evidence in veterinary disputes.
Published 8 November 2026
The 2016 decision
On 10 May 2016 the Federal Court of Justice held that a gross veterinary treatment error capable of causing the type of harm that occurred will normally reverse the objective burden of proof concerning causation. The decision is VI ZR 247/15.
What the ruling does not establish
It does not turn every unsuccessful treatment into negligence or reverse every evidential burden whenever any mistake is shown. The nature of the error and its suitability to cause the harm remain central questions.
Practical relevance today
Preserve the complete clinical record and obtain expert input on the professional standard. A useful opinion distinguishes the alleged error, whether it is gross, the injury and the causal pathway. Those questions help both claimants and veterinary practices assess litigation risk.
How this archive entry is dated
This is a retrospective explanation of a 2016 judgment, first published on this website on 8 November 2026. It is not presented as an article published contemporaneously in 2016.
More insights and archive articles · Explore our services
Discuss your matter
Send a short description, the parties involved and any deadline. We check conflicts and agree the scope and fees before starting work. For urgent matters, telephone our office as well.