<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pedigree dog - ANIMAL LAW - German Attorneys at law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://animal-lawyer.de/german/pedigree-dog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://animal-lawyer.de</link>
	<description>Animal law, horse law and animal liability in Germany</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2019 12:30:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">166617313</site>	<item>
		<title>Male dog holder does not have to be liable for mating</title>
		<link>https://animal-lawyer.de/halter-eines-rueden-muss-nicht-fuer-deckakt-haften/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=halter-eines-rueden-muss-nicht-fuer-deckakt-haften</link>
					<comments>https://animal-lawyer.de/halter-eines-rueden-muss-nicht-fuer-deckakt-haften/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[horak Attorneys at law]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 12:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Compensation for damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunal Decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Half-breed dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Half-breed pup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keeper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedigree dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribunal Decision]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hannover.tierrechtsanwalt.de/?p=1434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A historical dispute following unplanned mating and a claim for compensation.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://animal-lawyer.de/halter-eines-rueden-muss-nicht-fuer-deckakt-haften/">Male dog holder does not have to be liable for mating</a> first appeared on <a href="https://animal-lawyer.de">ANIMAL LAW - German Attorneys at law</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The district court (AG) Daun decided that the owner of a mixed breed dog does not have to be liable for unintentional mating of a mating pedigree dog by his male dog. A mongrel male mated with a female in heat. Six mixed-breed puppies resulted from it. The owner of the non-pedigree puppies sued the owner of the male dog for damages. The court rejected the complaint. Reason? The owner could not…</p>
<p><a href="https://animal-lawyer.de/halter-eines-rueden-muss-nicht-fuer-deckakt-haften/" rel="nofollow">Source</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://animal-lawyer.de/halter-eines-rueden-muss-nicht-fuer-deckakt-haften/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1434</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
